An Alternative to Dark Matter? Part 3: An Open Universe (3 Gy to 76 Gy) Galaxies and Structures Rotation
نویسندگان
چکیده
A cosmological model was developed using the equation of state photon gas, as well cosmic time. The primary objective this is to see if determining observed rotation speed galactic matter possible, without dark (halo) a parameter. To do so, numerical application evolution variables in accordance with time and new determine precise, realistic values for number parameters, such energy universe U, constant EΛ, curvature space k, density ρΛe, age tΩ (part 1). That universe, when taken into consideration during formation first galaxies (FΛ(r), which can partially explain, recourse matter, rotations some galaxies, M33, UGC12591, UGC2885, NGC3198, NGC253, DDO161, UDG44, MW Coma cluster. Today, MW, that gravity force order 1026 times smaller than conventional force. predicts an acceleration mass (q~-0.986); associated Ek driving behind expansion rather EΛ. An obtained form Friedmann relative Planck power PP or FP acting at frontier moving c. This force, from unknown sources, acts everywhere stretching effect on volume. Finally, partly explains value a0 MOND theory. Indeed, not true constant, but depends great structures were formed (~1 [Gy]), adjustment typical dimension those structures, galaxies. different expression FΛ expressed by Λ, through energy-mass equivalent structures. It does put question G.
منابع مشابه
Alternatives to Dark Matter 3
It has long been known that Newtonian dynamics applied to the visible matter in galaxies and clusters does not correctly describe the dynamics of those systems. While this is generally taken as evidence for dark matter it is in principle possible that instead Newtonian dynamics (and with it General Relativity) breaks down in these systems. Indeed there have been a number of proposals as to how ...
متن کاملA Comparative Study of Daily 3-Gy Hypofractionated and 1.8-Gy Conventional Breast Irradiation in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
We retrospectively compared accelerated hypofractionation (AHF) with conventional fractionation (CF) in the radiation therapy (RT) for early-stage breast cancer patients.Three hundred seventy-nine early-stage (pT1-2 and pN0-1a) breast cancer patients who received RT with AHF after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) were included. These patients were matched with 379 corresponding patients who rece...
متن کاملAn Alternative Approach to Vacuum Energy, Dark Matter & Gravitational Lensing
Various TeVeS-like and f(R)-like theories of gravity have added an interesting twist to the search for dark matter and vacuum energy, modifying the landscape of astrophysics day by day. A common thread of various theories is a non-uniform vector field fluid in the vacuum (see an up-to-date summary of relations between various theories by Halle, Zhao & Li, arXiv0711.0958 1). These ”alternative” ...
متن کاملGravitational vacuum polarization as an alternative to dark matter
It is assumed that the quantum vacuum may be studied as consisting of two contributions, with positive and negative energy respectively, which interact but slightly and may be displaced from each other. Then it is proposed that dark matter may be just an increase of the quantum vacuum energy, with respect to the normal dark energy level, induced by the gravitational field of galaxies or cluster...
متن کاملRelativistic MOND as an alternative to the dark matter paradigm
Milgrom’s Modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) provides an efficient way to summarize phenomenology of galaxies which does not lean on the notion of dark matter; it has great predictive power. Here I briefly review MOND as well as its implementation as a nonrelativistic modified gravity theory, AQUAL. Gravitational lensing and cosmology call for a relativistic gravity theory different from genera...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of high energy physics, gravitation and cosmology
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['2380-4335', '2380-4327']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jhepgc.2021.73048